PairBook
HomeMIRA › MIRA vs WM

MIRA vs WM: Correlation

MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MIRA) and Waste Management (WM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.37.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.37
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1420.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MIRA and WM?

Over the past 3 years, MIRA and WM moved with a correlation of -0.37, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.01) than the 3-year average (-0.37). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1420.0 %².

WM is close to the least connected end of MIRA's tracked universe, ranking #16 of 16. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WM ahead by 41.8 points (-43.8% versus -2.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since MIRA carries 11.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MIRA vs WM: side by side

MIRA (MIRA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return-43.8%-2.0%
5-year returnn/a+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)211.2%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.070.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-91.5%-18.1%
Market cap$87.0B
P/E (trailing)30.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -91.5%
-47%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MIRA · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearMIRAWM
2022-4.5%
2023+16.2%
2024+8.6%+14.3%
2025+32.5%+10.5%
2026-49.0%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MIRA and WM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.37, MIRA and WM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MIRA and WM?

The MIRA/WM correlation stands at -0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.01, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WM a good diversifier for MIRA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.37, MIRA and WM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.37 mean?

A reading of -0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mira-vs-wm.json

MIRA vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.37MIRA vs WM-0.37

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MIRA vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mira-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mira-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MIRA correlations · WM correlations