PairBook
HomeMGIH › MGIH vs WCC

MGIH vs WCC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Millennium Group International Holdings Limited (MGIH) and WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-903.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MGIH and WCC?

On 3 years of weekly data the MGIH/WCC correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.07 versus -0.24 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -903.6 %².

WCC is close to the least connected end of MGIH's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WCC ahead by 69.2 points (-13.8% versus +55.4%). One caveat on sizing: MGIH is 2.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MGIH vs WCC: side by side

MGIH (Millennium Group International Holdings Limited)WCC (WESCO International, Inc.)
1-year return-13.8%+55.4%
5-year returnn/a+203.7%
Volatility (ann.)100.5%38.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.321.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-60.1%-37.4%
Market cap$17.1B
P/E (trailing)24.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.55%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WCC 0.55% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WCC -37.4% vs -60.1%
-19%0%+76%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MGIH · WCC

Year-by-year returns

YearMGIHWCC
2022-4.9%
2023+40.2%
2024+21.8%+5.1%
2025-17.9%+36.4%
2026+26.6%+43.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MGIH and WCC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MGIH and WCC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.07 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is WCC a good diversifier for MGIH?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mgih-vs-wcc.json

MGIH vs WCC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24MGIH vs WCC-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MGIH vs WCC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mgih-vs-wcc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mgih-vs-wcc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MGIH correlations · WCC correlations