PairBook
HomeMGF › MGF vs VXZ

MGF vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aberdeen Government Markets Income Fund (MGF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.26
long-run
Ann. covariance
-49.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MGF and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the MGF/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.22). The 5-year figure is -0.26, and annualized covariance runs at -49.4 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of MGF's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 10. The last year tells two different stories: MGF led by 17.8 percentage points, +1.7% for MGF against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: VXZ is 2.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MGF vs VXZ: side by side

MGF (Aberdeen Government Markets Income Fund)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+1.7%-16.1%
5-year return-3.4%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)8.8%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.17-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-8.7%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)26.3
Dividend yield8.17%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MGF -8.7% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MGF -3.4% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MGF · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMGFVXZ
2022-15.8%+0.5%
2023+3.8%-44.0%
2024+4.2%-12.7%
2025+6.3%+5.7%
2026+0.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MGF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MGF and VXZ?

The MGF/VXZ correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.26), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MGF?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mgf-vs-vxz.json

MGF vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22MGF vs VXZ-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MGF vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mgf-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mgf-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MGF correlations · VXZ correlations