PairBook
HomeMG › MG vs VXZ

MG vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Mistras Group Inc (MG) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.37, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.37
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
-381.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MG and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the MG/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.37, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.24) than the 3-year average (-0.37). The 5-year figure is -0.29, and annualized covariance runs at -381.1 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against MG, VXZ lands near the bottom at #13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MG ahead by 115.8 points (+99.7% versus -16.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: MG runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MG vs VXZ: side by side

MG (Mistras Group Inc)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+99.7%-16.1%
5-year return+87.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)39.7%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.84-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.8%-36.4%
Market cap$0.6B
P/E (trailing)22.6
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -40.8%Higher 5y return: MG +87.3% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+98%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MG · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMGVXZ
2022-33.6%+0.5%
2023+48.5%-44.0%
2024+23.8%-12.7%
2025+39.6%+5.7%
2026+52.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MG and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MG and VXZ?

The MG/VXZ correlation stands at -0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: -0.29), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.37 mean?

A reading of -0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mg-vs-vxz.json

MG vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.37MG vs VXZ-0.37

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MG vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mg-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mg-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MG correlations · VXZ correlations