PairBook
HomeMFC › MFC vs XLF

MFC vs XLF: Correlation

Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.75
long-run
Ann. covariance
243.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MFC and XLF?

Over the past 3 years, MFC and XLF moved with a correlation of 0.71, which is strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.60) runs below the 3-year figure (0.71). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.75, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 243.7 %².

Few assets follow MFC as closely as XLF, which ranks #1 of 12 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: MFC led by 37.0 percentage points, +46.3% for MFC against +9.3% for XLF.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MFC vs XLF: side by side

MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+46.3%+9.3%
5-year return+174.6%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)21.2%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.870.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-16.8%-15.5%
Market cap$71.7B
P/E (trailing)16.2
Dividend yield4.28%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Higher yield: MFC 4.28% vs 1.42%Smaller drawdown: XLF -15.5% vs -16.8%Higher 5y return: MFC +174.6% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-9%0%+48%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MFC · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearMFCXLF
2022-1.2%-10.6%
2023+31.1%+12.0%
2024+45.2%+30.6%
2025+20.6%+14.9%
2026+22.3%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MFC and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.71 means MFC and XLF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MFC and XLF?

The MFC/XLF correlation stands at 0.71 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.60, 5 years: 0.75), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLF a good diversifier for MFC?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.71 means MFC and XLF share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mfc-vs-xlf.json

MFC vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71MFC vs XLF0.71

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MFC vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mfc-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mfc-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MFC correlations · XLF correlations