PairBook
HomeMDT › MDT vs SOC

MDT vs SOC: Correlation

How closely do Medtronic (MDT) and Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-371.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MDT and SOC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MDT and SOC correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.13, with an annualized covariance of -371.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, SOC places #28 of the 34 assets tracked against MDT. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MDT outperformed by 84.5 percentage points (+0.9% for MDT against -83.6% for SOC). Note the risk asymmetry: SOC runs 4.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MDT vs SOC: side by side

MDT (Medtronic)SOC (Sable Offshore Corp.)
1-year return+0.9%-83.6%
5-year return-21.4%-51.7%
Volatility (ann.)21.0%101.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.370.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.9%-90.7%
Market cap$115.2B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)24.1
Dividend yield3.09%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: MDT 3.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MDT -28.9% vs -90.7%Higher 5y return: MDT -21.4% vs -51.7%
-83%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MDT · SOC

Year-by-year returns

YearMDTSOC
2022-22.6%+3.4%
2023+9.6%+13.3%
2024+0.3%+101.1%
2025+24.0%-60.6%
2026-4.7%-48.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MDT and SOC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, MDT and SOC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MDT and SOC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with -0.40 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is SOC a good diversifier for MDT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, MDT and SOC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mdt-vs-soc.json

MDT vs SOC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17MDT vs SOC-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MDT vs SOC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mdt-vs-soc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mdt-vs-soc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MDT correlations · SOC correlations