PairBook
HomeMDT › MDT vs NCI

MDT vs NCI: Correlation

How closely do Medtronic (MDT) and Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited - Class A (NCI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-664.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MDT and NCI?

On 3 years of weekly data the MDT/NCI correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -664.2 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against MDT, NCI ranks #26 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance MDT holds a 6.7-point edge, +0.9% against -5.8%. Note the risk asymmetry: NCI runs 8.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MDT vs NCI: side by side

MDT (Medtronic)NCI (Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited - Class A)
1-year return+0.9%-5.8%
5-year return-21.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)21.0%184.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.37-0.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.9%-99.0%
Market cap$115.2B
P/E (trailing)24.1154.5
Dividend yield3.09%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: MDT 24.1 vs 154.5Higher yield: MDT 3.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MDT -28.9% vs -99.0%
-70%0%+493%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MDT · NCI

Year-by-year returns

YearMDTNCI
2022-22.6%
2023+9.6%
2024+0.3%
2025+24.0%-65.8%
2026-4.7%+36.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MDT and NCI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MDT and NCI?

The MDT/NCI correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NCI a good diversifier for MDT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mdt-vs-nci.json

MDT vs NCI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17MDT vs NCI-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MDT vs NCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mdt-vs-nci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mdt-vs-nci/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MDT correlations · NCI correlations