PairBook
HomeMCO › MCO vs NRT

MCO vs NRT: Correlation

Moody's Corporation (MCO) and North European Oil Royality Trust (NRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.03
long-run
Ann. covariance
-248.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCO and NRT?

Over the past 3 years, MCO and NRT moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.19). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.03, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -248.3 %².

Within MCO's tracked universe of 53 assets, NRT comes in at #47 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: NRT led by 84.5 percentage points, +0.7% for MCO against +85.2% for NRT. Risk is not evenly split, since NRT carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCO vs NRT: side by side

MCO (Moody's Corporation)NRT (North European Oil Royality Trust)
1-year return+0.7%+85.2%
5-year return+39.4%+131.5%
Volatility (ann.)25.8%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.08-0.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-24.7%-66.1%
Market cap$88.2B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)32.78.4
Dividend yield0.77%11.95%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: NRT 8.4 vs 32.7Higher yield: NRT 11.95% vs 0.77%Smaller drawdown: MCO -24.7% vs -66.1%Higher 5y return: NRT +131.5% vs +39.4%
-14%0%+107%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MCO · NRT

Year-by-year returns

YearMCONRT
2022-28.0%+41.9%
2023+41.5%-46.5%
2024+22.2%-25.3%
2025+8.7%+88.4%
2026+0.3%+41.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCO and NRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCO and NRT?

The MCO/NRT correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.06, 5 years: 0.03), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NRT a good diversifier for MCO?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mco-vs-nrt.json

MCO vs NRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19MCO vs NRT-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MCO vs NRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mco-vs-nrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mco-vs-nrt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCO correlations · NRT correlations