PairBook
HomeMCN › MCN vs VXZ

MCN vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund (MCN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.46, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.46
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.52
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
-164.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCN and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MCN and VXZ correlate at -0.46, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.52 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.45, with an annualized covariance of -164.4 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against MCN, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MCN ahead by 17.9 points (+1.8% versus -16.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: VXZ runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCN vs VXZ: side by side

MCN (XAI Madison Equity Premium Income Fund)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+1.8%-16.1%
5-year return+17.0%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)13.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.46-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-24.5%-36.4%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)18.2
Dividend yield12.74%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MCN -24.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MCN +17.0% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MCN · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMCNVXZ
2022+6.3%+0.5%
2023+7.0%-44.0%
2024-1.5%-12.7%
2025+0.7%+5.7%
2026+2.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.46, MCN and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCN and VXZ?

The MCN/VXZ correlation stands at -0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.52, 5 years: -0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MCN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.46, MCN and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.46 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcn-vs-vxz.json

MCN vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.46MCN vs VXZ-0.46

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MCN vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcn-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcn-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCN correlations · VXZ correlations