PairBook
HomeMCHP › MCHP vs SMH

MCHP vs SMH: Correlation

How closely do Microchip Technology (MCHP) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.71, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.76
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.75
long-run
Ann. covariance
1115.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCHP and SMH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MCHP and SMH correlate at 0.71, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.76 over 1 year against 0.71 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.75, with an annualized covariance of 1115.6 %².

Among the 44 assets we track against MCHP, SMH ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SMH led by 76.9 percentage points, +16.2% for MCHP against +93.1% for SMH. The link looks structural: the rolling one-year correlation barely moved, holding between 0.59 and 0.82.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCHP vs SMH: side by side

MCHP (Microchip Technology)SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)
1-year return+16.2%+93.1%
5-year return+5.9%+332.8%
Volatility (ann.)46.7%33.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.971.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.8%-35.7%
Market cap$41.0B
P/E (trailing)109.4
Dividend yield2.46%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyETF · Thematic
Smaller drawdown: SMH -35.7% vs -63.8%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +5.9%
-23%0%+126%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MCHP · SMH

Year-by-year returns

YearMCHPSMH
2022-18.0%-33.5%
2023+30.9%+73.4%
2024-35.0%+39.1%
2025+14.6%+49.2%
2026+20.5%+59.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCHP and SMH good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCHP and SMH?

The MCHP/SMH correlation stands at 0.71 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.76, 5 years: 0.75), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMH a good diversifier for MCHP?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.71 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mchp-vs-smh.json

MCHP vs SMH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71MCHP vs SMH0.71

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MCHP vs SMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mchp-vs-smh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mchp-vs-smh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCHP correlations · SMH correlations