PairBook
HomeMCB › MCB vs VXZ

MCB vs VXZ: Correlation

Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.42.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.42
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
-465.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MCB and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MCB and VXZ correlate at -0.42, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.28) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.42). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.40, with an annualized covariance of -465.4 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against MCB, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MCB ahead by 33.6 points (+17.5% versus -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since MCB carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MCB vs VXZ: side by side

MCB (Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+17.5%-16.1%
5-year return+20.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)43.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.94-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.3%-36.4%
Market cap$1.1B
P/E (trailing)11.7
Dividend yield0.82%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -42.3%Higher 5y return: MCB +20.3% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+26%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MCB · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMCBVXZ
2022-44.9%+0.5%
2023-5.6%-44.0%
2024+5.5%-12.7%
2025+31.3%+5.7%
2026+21.1%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MCB and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MCB and VXZ?

The MCB/VXZ correlation stands at -0.42 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MCB?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.42 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mcb-vs-vxz.json

MCB vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.42MCB vs VXZ-0.42

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MCB vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mcb-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mcb-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MCB correlations · VXZ correlations