PairBook
HomeMC › MC vs MS

MC vs MS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Moelis & Company (MC) and Morgan Stanley (MS) carry a correlation of 0.73, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.73
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.61
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.67
long-run
Ann. covariance
725.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MC and MS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MC and MS correlate at 0.73, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.61) than the 3-year average (0.73). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.67, with an annualized covariance of 725.1 %².

Within MC's tracked universe of 14 assets, MS comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MS led by 48.6 percentage points, -1.5% for MC against +47.1% for MS.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MC vs MS: side by side

MC (Moelis & Company)MS (Morgan Stanley)
1-year return-1.5%+47.1%
5-year return+42.5%+142.0%
Volatility (ann.)35.1%28.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.411.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-39.3%-29.2%
Market cap$5.1B$337.5B
P/E (trailing)23.417.4
Dividend yield3.87%1.94%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Lower P/E: MS 17.4 vs 23.4Higher yield: MC 3.87% vs 1.94%Smaller drawdown: MS -29.2% vs -39.3%Higher 5y return: MS +142.0% vs +42.5%
-25%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MC · MS

Year-by-year returns

YearMCMS
2022-35.2%-10.3%
2023+54.9%+13.9%
2024+37.1%+39.7%
2025-3.1%+45.2%
2026+2.9%+23.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MC and MS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.73 means MC and MS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MC and MS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MC and MS is 0.73 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and 0.67 over 5 years.

Is MS a good diversifier for MC?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.73 means MC and MS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.73 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mc-vs-ms.json

MC vs MS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.73MC vs MS0.73

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MC vs MS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mc-vs-ms.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mc-vs-ms/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MC correlations · MS correlations