PairBook
HomeMATH › MATH vs UMH

MATH vs UMH: Correlation

Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) and UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-416.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MATH and UMH?

On 3 years of weekly data the MATH/UMH correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.16) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.05, and annualized covariance runs at -416.0 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against MATH, UMH lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: UMH led by 81.7 percentage points, -70.7% for MATH against +11.0% for UMH. Note the risk asymmetry: MATH runs 4.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MATH vs UMH: side by side

MATH (Metalpha Technology Holding Limited)UMH (UMH Properties, Inc.)
1-year return-70.7%+11.0%
5-year return-40.4%-11.7%
Volatility (ann.)90.1%20.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-81.9%-27.3%
Market cap$1.4B
P/E (trailing)41.7137.5
Dividend yield0.00%5.40%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: MATH 41.7 vs 137.5Higher yield: UMH 5.40% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: UMH -27.3% vs -81.9%Higher 5y return: UMH -11.7% vs -40.4%
-76%0%+15%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MATH · UMH

Year-by-year returns

YearMATHUMH
2022-57.4%-38.7%
2023+323.3%+0.2%
2024-47.2%+29.6%
2025+82.6%-11.0%
2026-60.3%+8.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MATH and UMH good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MATH and UMH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.16 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is UMH a good diversifier for MATH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/math-vs-umh.json

MATH vs UMH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22MATH vs UMH-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MATH vs UMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/math-vs-umh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/math-vs-umh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MATH correlations · UMH correlations