MAS vs SITE: Correlation
Masco (MAS) and SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.69.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MAS and SITE?
Over the past 3 years, MAS and SITE moved with a correlation of 0.69, which is strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.67) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.72, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 760.1 %².
Among the 61 assets we track against MAS, SITE ranks #18 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MAS led by 33.7 percentage points, -0.5% for MAS against -34.2% for SITE.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MAS vs SITE: side by side
| MAS (Masco) | SITE (SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -0.5% | -34.2% |
| 5-year return | +29.1% | -52.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 29.6% | 37.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -30.9% | -49.5% |
| Market cap | $14.4B | $4.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 17.0 | 26.3 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Industrials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MAS | SITE |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -32.1% | -51.6% |
| 2023 | +46.6% | +38.5% |
| 2024 | +10.0% | -18.9% |
| 2025 | -10.9% | -5.5% |
| 2026 | +16.3% | -23.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MAS and SITE good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means MAS and SITE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MAS and SITE?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MAS and SITE is 0.69 over 3 years, 0.67 over 1 year and 0.72 over 5 years.
Is SITE a good diversifier for MAS?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means MAS and SITE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.69 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mas-vs-site.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mas-vs-site/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MAS correlations · SITE correlations
