MAS vs PHM: Correlation
How closely do Masco (MAS) and PulteGroup (PHM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.73, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MAS and PHM?
On 3 years of weekly data the MAS/PHM correlation comes out at 0.73, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.76) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.73, and annualized covariance runs at 693.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, PHM places #11 of the 61 assets tracked against MAS. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -0.5% against -2.5%. The rolling one-year correlation stayed in a tight band between 0.66 and 0.82 over the past three years, which points to a structural rather than episodic relationship.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MAS vs PHM: side by side
| MAS (Masco) | PHM (PulteGroup) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -0.5% | -2.5% |
| 5-year return | +29.1% | +145.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 29.6% | 32.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.95 | 0.82 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -30.9% | -38.0% |
| Market cap | $14.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 17.0 | 13.3 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.77% |
| Sector / category | Industrials | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MAS | PHM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -32.1% | -19.2% |
| 2023 | +46.6% | +128.8% |
| 2024 | +10.0% | +6.2% |
| 2025 | -10.9% | +8.5% |
| 2026 | +16.3% | +8.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MAS and PHM good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.73 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MAS and PHM?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.73 over 3 years, with 0.76 over the last year and 0.73 over 5 years.
Is PHM a good diversifier for MAS?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.73 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.73 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.73 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mas-vs-phm.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mas-vs-phm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MAS correlations · PHM correlations
