PairBook
HomeMAMO › MAMO vs TER

MAMO vs TER: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Massimo Group (MAMO) and Teradyne (TER) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1147.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MAMO and TER?

Over the past 3 years, MAMO and TER moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.37 versus -0.24 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1147.9 %².

Within MAMO's tracked universe of 23 assets, TER comes in at #18 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: TER led by 284.9 percentage points, -66.1% for MAMO against +218.8% for TER. Note the risk asymmetry: MAMO runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MAMO vs TER: side by side

MAMO (Massimo Group)TER (Teradyne)
1-year return-66.1%+218.8%
5-year returnn/a+207.9%
Volatility (ann.)87.3%52.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.531.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.6%-58.2%
Market cap$58.2B
P/E (trailing)10.050.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.14%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Lower P/E: MAMO 10.0 vs 50.0Higher yield: TER 0.14% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TER -58.2% vs -83.6%
-57%0%+265%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MAMO · TER

Year-by-year returns

YearMAMOTER
2022-46.3%
2023+24.8%
2024+16.5%
2025+54.9%+54.4%
2026-74.9%+92.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MAMO and TER good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, MAMO and TER have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MAMO and TER?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MAMO and TER is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.37 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is TER a good diversifier for MAMO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, MAMO and TER have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mamo-vs-ter.json

MAMO vs TER: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24MAMO vs TER-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MAMO vs TER correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mamo-vs-ter.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mamo-vs-ter/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MAMO correlations · TER correlations