PairBook
HomeMAMO › MAMO vs PSX

MAMO vs PSX: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Massimo Group (MAMO) and Phillips 66 (PSX) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-541.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MAMO and PSX?

Over the past 3 years, MAMO and PSX moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.29) than the 3-year average (-0.18). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -541.1 %².

Among the 23 assets we track against MAMO, PSX ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PSX outperformed by 152.3 percentage points (-66.1% for MAMO against +86.2% for PSX). One caveat on sizing: MAMO is 2.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MAMO vs PSX: side by side

MAMO (Massimo Group)PSX (Phillips 66)
1-year return-66.1%+86.2%
5-year returnn/a+301.8%
Volatility (ann.)87.3%33.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.58
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.6%-44.4%
Market cap$96.1B
P/E (trailing)10.013.8
Dividend yield0.00%2.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Lower P/E: MAMO 10.0 vs 13.8Higher yield: PSX 2.04% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PSX -44.4% vs -83.6%
-57%0%+144%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MAMO · PSX

Year-by-year returns

YearMAMOPSX
2022+49.6%
2023+33.1%
2024-11.6%
2025+54.9%+17.5%
2026-74.9%+89.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MAMO and PSX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, MAMO and PSX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MAMO and PSX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MAMO and PSX is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.29 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is PSX a good diversifier for MAMO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, MAMO and PSX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mamo-vs-psx.json

MAMO vs PSX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18MAMO vs PSX-0.18

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MAMO vs PSX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mamo-vs-psx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mamo-vs-psx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MAMO correlations · PSX correlations