PairBook
HomeMAMO › MAMO vs PBF

MAMO vs PBF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Massimo Group (MAMO) and PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1148.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MAMO and PBF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MAMO and PBF correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1148.4 %².

Among the 23 assets we track against MAMO, PBF ranks #13 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PBF ahead by 233.1 points (-66.1% versus +167.0%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MAMO vs PBF: side by side

MAMO (Massimo Group)PBF (PBF Energy Inc.)
1-year return-66.1%+167.0%
5-year returnn/a+642.1%
Volatility (ann.)87.3%58.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.6%-76.0%
Market cap$8.1B
P/E (trailing)10.06.1
Dividend yield0.00%1.58%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PBF 6.1 vs 10.0Higher yield: PBF 1.58% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PBF -76.0% vs -83.6%
-57%0%+165%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MAMO · PBF

Year-by-year returns

YearMAMOPBF
2022+215.8%
2023+10.0%
2024-38.0%
2025+54.9%+6.8%
2026-74.9%+157.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MAMO and PBF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MAMO and PBF?

The MAMO/PBF correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PBF a good diversifier for MAMO?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mamo-vs-pbf.json

MAMO vs PBF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21MAMO vs PBF-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MAMO vs PBF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mamo-vs-pbf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mamo-vs-pbf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MAMO correlations · PBF correlations