MAMO vs MPC: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Massimo Group (MAMO) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MAMO and MPC?
On 3 years of weekly data the MAMO/MPC correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.33 versus -0.22 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -679.4 %².
Within MAMO's tracked universe of 23 assets, MPC comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MPC led by 173.9 percentage points, -66.1% for MAMO against +107.8% for MPC. Risk is not evenly split, since MAMO carries 2.6 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MAMO vs MPC: side by side
| MAMO (Massimo Group) | MPC (Marathon Petroleum) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -66.1% | +107.8% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +589.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 87.3% | 34.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.53 | 0.48 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -83.6% | -44.7% |
| Market cap | – | $102.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.0 | 12.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Energy |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MAMO | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +86.6% |
| 2023 | – | +30.5% |
| 2024 | – | -4.1% |
| 2025 | +54.9% | +19.2% |
| 2026 | -74.9% | +126.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MAMO and MPC good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MAMO and MPC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.33 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is MPC a good diversifier for MAMO?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?
A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mamo-vs-mpc.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mamo-vs-mpc/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MAMO correlations · MPC correlations