PairBook
HomeMAMO › MAMO vs MPC

MAMO vs MPC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Massimo Group (MAMO) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-679.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MAMO and MPC?

On 3 years of weekly data the MAMO/MPC correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.33 versus -0.22 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -679.4 %².

Within MAMO's tracked universe of 23 assets, MPC comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MPC led by 173.9 percentage points, -66.1% for MAMO against +107.8% for MPC. Risk is not evenly split, since MAMO carries 2.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MAMO vs MPC: side by side

MAMO (Massimo Group)MPC (Marathon Petroleum)
1-year return-66.1%+107.8%
5-year returnn/a+589.6%
Volatility (ann.)87.3%34.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.48
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.6%-44.7%
Market cap$102.1B
P/E (trailing)10.012.6
Dividend yield0.00%1.10%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Lower P/E: MAMO 10.0 vs 12.6Higher yield: MPC 1.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MPC -44.7% vs -83.6%
-57%0%+144%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MAMO · MPC

Year-by-year returns

YearMAMOMPC
2022+86.6%
2023+30.5%
2024-4.1%
2025+54.9%+19.2%
2026-74.9%+126.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MAMO and MPC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MAMO and MPC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.33 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MPC a good diversifier for MAMO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mamo-vs-mpc.json

MAMO vs MPC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22MAMO vs MPC-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MAMO vs MPC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mamo-vs-mpc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mamo-vs-mpc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MAMO correlations · MPC correlations