PairBook
HomeM › M vs TNDM

M vs TNDM: Correlation

How closely do Macy's Inc (M) and Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.38
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
1343.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are M and TNDM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of M and TNDM correlate at 0.38, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.24) than the 3-year average (0.38). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 1343.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, TNDM places #9 of the 14 assets tracked against M. Their 12-month results are close: +71.8% for M against +74.7% for TNDM.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

M vs TNDM: side by side

M (Macy's Inc)TNDM (Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.)
1-year return+71.8%+74.7%
5-year return+21.5%-80.9%
Volatility (ann.)49.3%71.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.060.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-51.3%-81.1%
Market cap$5.9B$1.5B
P/E (trailing)9.4
Dividend yield3.24%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: M 3.24% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: M -51.3% vs -81.1%Higher 5y return: M +21.5% vs -80.9%
-5%0%+101%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). M · TNDM

Year-by-year returns

YearMTNDM
2022-18.7%-70.1%
2023+1.6%-34.2%
2024-12.4%+21.8%
2025+36.5%-39.0%
2026+4.0%-2.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are M and TNDM good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.38, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between M and TNDM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between M and TNDM is 0.38 over 3 years, 0.24 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.

Is TNDM a good diversifier for M?

A fair diversifier. At 0.38, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/m-vs-tndm.json

M vs TNDM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.38M vs TNDM0.38

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![M vs TNDM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/m-vs-tndm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/m-vs-tndm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: M correlations · TNDM correlations