LYB vs WFCF: Correlation
LyondellBasell (LYB) and Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LYB and WFCF?
On 3 years of weekly data the LYB/WFCF correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -361.9 %².
Out of 36 assets tracked against LYB, WFCF lands near the bottom at #33. Over the last 12 months LYB came out ahead by 8.7 percentage points (+19.1% against +10.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: WFCF runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LYB vs WFCF: side by side
| LYB (LyondellBasell) | WFCF (Where Food Comes From, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +19.1% | +10.4% |
| 5-year return | -12.8% | +0.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 33.7% | 57.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.42 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -55.4% | -49.1% |
| Market cap | $20.4B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 45.7 |
| Dividend yield | 6.58% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Materials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LYB | WFCF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -1.0% | -3.7% |
| 2023 | +20.7% | -3.0% |
| 2024 | -17.4% | -2.3% |
| 2025 | -36.0% | -13.2% |
| 2026 | +50.5% | +15.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LYB and WFCF good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LYB and WFCF?
The LYB/WFCF correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is WFCF a good diversifier for LYB?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lyb-vs-wfcf.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lyb-vs-wfcf/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LYB correlations · WFCF correlations
