LVS vs SF: Correlation
How closely do Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and Stifel Financial Corporation (SF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.41, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LVS and SF?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LVS and SF correlate at 0.41, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.50 over 1 year against 0.41 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.39, with an annualized covariance of 391.1 %².
Within LVS's tracked universe of 29 assets, SF comes in at #12 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SF outperformed by 26.3 percentage points (-20.3% for LVS against +6.0% for SF).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LVS vs SF: side by side
| LVS (Las Vegas Sands) | SF (Stifel Financial Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -20.3% | +6.0% |
| 5-year return | +8.5% | +92.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 34.8% | 27.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.75 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -44.0% | -34.7% |
| Market cap | $28.7B | $12.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 17.1 | 14.4 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 1.59% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LVS | SF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +27.7% | -15.6% |
| 2023 | +3.1% | +21.2% |
| 2024 | +6.2% | +56.4% |
| 2025 | +29.5% | +20.1% |
| 2026 | -30.8% | -2.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LVS and SF good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LVS and SF?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LVS and SF is 0.41 over 3 years, 0.50 over 1 year and 0.39 over 5 years.
Is SF a good diversifier for LVS?
A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lvs-vs-sf.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lvs-vs-sf/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LVS correlations · SF correlations
