PairBook
HomeLUNR › LUNR vs WHWK

LUNR vs WHWK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) and Whitehawk Therapeutics, Inc. (WHWK) carry a correlation of 0.35, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.35
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
2653.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LUNR and WHWK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LUNR and WHWK correlate at 0.35, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.53) than the 3-year average (0.35). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.14, with an annualized covariance of 2653.7 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against LUNR, WHWK lands near the bottom at #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WHWK ahead by 89.1 points (+80.0% versus +169.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: LUNR runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LUNR vs WHWK: side by side

LUNR (Intuitive Machines, Inc.)WHWK (Whitehawk Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+80.0%+169.1%
5-year return+67.7%-80.9%
Volatility (ann.)109.4%69.1%
Beta vs S&P 5003.311.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-75.1%-80.6%
Market cap$2.6B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LUNR -75.1% vs -80.6%Higher 5y return: LUNR +67.7% vs -80.9%
0%+416%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LUNR · WHWK

Year-by-year returns

YearLUNRWHWK
2022+3.7%-46.9%
2023-74.4%-84.3%
2024+610.8%+56.2%
2025-10.6%-23.3%
2026-0.3%+101.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LUNR and WHWK good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.35, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LUNR and WHWK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LUNR and WHWK is 0.35 over 3 years, 0.53 over 1 year and 0.14 over 5 years.

Is WHWK a good diversifier for LUNR?

A fair diversifier. At 0.35, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lunr-vs-whwk.json

LUNR vs WHWK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.35LUNR vs WHWK0.35

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LUNR vs WHWK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lunr-vs-whwk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lunr-vs-whwk/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LUNR correlations · WHWK correlations