PairBook
HomeLULU › LULU vs WTI

LULU vs WTI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) and W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-596.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LULU and WTI?

Over the past 3 years, LULU and WTI moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.34 versus -0.22 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -596.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, WTI places #29 of the 34 assets tracked against LULU. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WTI outperformed by 149.0 percentage points (-44.1% for LULU against +104.9% for WTI). One caveat on sizing: WTI is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LULU vs WTI: side by side

LULU (Lululemon Athletica)WTI (W&T Offshore, Inc.)
1-year return-44.1%+104.9%
5-year return-72.3%+18.8%
Volatility (ann.)41.8%64.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.980.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-74.3%
Market cap$13.1B$0.6B
P/E (trailing)9.4
Dividend yield0.00%1.12%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: WTI 1.12% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WTI -74.3% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: WTI +18.8% vs -72.3%
-33%0%+172%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LULU · WTI

Year-by-year returns

YearLULUWTI
2022-18.2%+72.8%
2023+59.6%-41.4%
2024-25.2%-48.2%
2025-45.7%+0.6%
2026-44.7%+126.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LULU and WTI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, LULU and WTI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LULU and WTI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.34 over the last year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is WTI a good diversifier for LULU?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, LULU and WTI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lulu-vs-wti.json

LULU vs WTI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22LULU vs WTI-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LULU vs WTI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lulu-vs-wti.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lulu-vs-wti/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LULU correlations · WTI correlations