LULU vs WLYB: Correlation
Lululemon Athletica (LULU) and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LULU and WLYB?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LULU and WLYB correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.06, with an annualized covariance of -321.2 %².
Among the 34 assets we track against LULU, WLYB ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WLYB ahead by 85.0 points (-44.1% versus +40.9%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LULU vs WLYB: side by side
| LULU (Lululemon Athletica) | WLYB (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -44.1% | +40.9% |
| 5-year return | -72.3% | +10.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 41.8% | 37.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.98 | 0.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -79.4% | -41.5% |
| Market cap | $13.1B | $2.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | 9.4 | 13.0 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LULU | WLYB |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -18.2% | -27.5% |
| 2023 | +59.6% | -14.7% |
| 2024 | -25.2% | +41.5% |
| 2025 | -45.7% | -27.3% |
| 2026 | -44.7% | +78.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LULU and WLYB good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LULU and WLYB?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.24 over the last year and -0.06 over 5 years.
Is WLYB a good diversifier for LULU?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lulu-vs-wlyb.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lulu-vs-wlyb/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LULU correlations · WLYB correlations
