PairBook
HomeLULU › LULU vs TRT

LULU vs TRT: Correlation

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) and Trio-Tech International (TRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-954.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LULU and TRT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LULU and TRT correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.33) than the 3-year average (-0.21). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -954.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, TRT places #26 of the 34 assets tracked against LULU. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TRT outperformed by 339.6 percentage points (-44.1% for LULU against +295.5% for TRT). Risk is not evenly split, since TRT carries 2.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LULU vs TRT: side by side

LULU (Lululemon Athletica)TRT (Trio-Tech International)
1-year return-44.1%+295.5%
5-year return-72.3%+365.8%
Volatility (ann.)41.8%107.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.980.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.4%-54.6%
Market cap$13.1B
P/E (trailing)9.4209.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Lower P/E: LULU 9.4 vs 209.6Smaller drawdown: TRT -54.6% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: TRT +365.8% vs -72.3%
-33%0%+647%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LULU · TRT

Year-by-year returns

YearLULUTRT
2022-18.2%-66.5%
2023+59.6%+12.7%
2024-25.2%+14.6%
2025-45.7%+127.9%
2026-44.7%+58.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LULU and TRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LULU and TRT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LULU and TRT is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.33 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is TRT a good diversifier for LULU?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lulu-vs-trt.json

LULU vs TRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21LULU vs TRT-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LULU vs TRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lulu-vs-trt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lulu-vs-trt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LULU correlations · TRT correlations