LULU vs QQQ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) carry a correlation of 0.30, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LULU and QQQ?
On 3 years of weekly data the LULU/QQQ correlation comes out at 0.30, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.27 over 1 year against 0.30 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.43, and annualized covariance runs at 241.2 %².
Within LULU's tracked universe of 34 assets, QQQ comes in at #24 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with QQQ ahead by 70.4 points (-44.1% versus +26.3%). Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from 0.03 to 0.55. One caveat on sizing: LULU is 2.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LULU vs QQQ: side by side
| LULU (Lululemon Athletica) | QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -44.1% | +26.3% |
| 5-year return | -72.3% | +95.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 41.8% | 19.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.98 | 1.28 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -79.4% | -22.8% |
| Market cap | $13.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 9.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.18% |
| Assets under management | – | $452.8B |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | ETF · US Growth & Tech |
QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LULU | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -18.2% | -32.6% |
| 2023 | +59.6% | +54.9% |
| 2024 | -25.2% | +25.6% |
| 2025 | -45.7% | +20.8% |
| 2026 | -44.7% | +17.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LULU and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.30, LULU and QQQ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LULU and QQQ?
The LULU/QQQ correlation stands at 0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.27, 5 years: 0.43), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is QQQ a good diversifier for LULU?
Reasonably. At 0.30, LULU and QQQ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lulu-vs-qqq.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lulu-vs-qqq/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LULU correlations · QQQ correlations
