PairBook
HomeLSAK › LSAK vs SMMT

LSAK vs SMMT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lesaka Technologies, Inc. (LSAK) and Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-962.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LSAK and SMMT?

On 3 years of weekly data the LSAK/SMMT correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.12) than the 3-year average (-0.21). The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -962.0 %².

SMMT is close to the least connected end of LSAK's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 15. The last year tells two different stories: LSAK led by 38.4 percentage points, -3.8% for LSAK against -42.2% for SMMT. Risk is not evenly split, since SMMT carries 4.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LSAK vs SMMT: side by side

LSAK (Lesaka Technologies, Inc.)SMMT (Summit Therapeutics Inc.)
1-year return-3.8%-42.2%
5-year return+6.3%+78.5%
Volatility (ann.)31.0%150.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.202.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-33.2%-66.1%
Market cap$0.4B$11.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LSAK -33.2% vs -66.1%Higher 5y return: SMMT +78.5% vs +6.3%
-50%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LSAK · SMMT

Year-by-year returns

YearLSAKSMMT
2022-14.5%+58.0%
2023-28.8%-38.6%
2024+68.2%+583.7%
2025-12.5%-2.0%
2026-4.4%-18.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LSAK and SMMT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LSAK and SMMT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LSAK and SMMT is -0.21 over 3 years, 0.12 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is SMMT a good diversifier for LSAK?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lsak-vs-smmt.json

LSAK vs SMMT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21LSAK vs SMMT-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LSAK vs SMMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lsak-vs-smmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lsak-vs-smmt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LSAK correlations · SMMT correlations