PairBook
HomeLPA › LPA vs S

LPA vs S: Correlation

How closely do Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.32, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-7999.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LPA and S?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LPA and S correlate at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.03 versus -0.32 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -7999.5 %².

Out of 21 assets tracked against LPA, S lands near the bottom at #18. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with S ahead by 84.7 points (-52.3% versus +32.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: LPA runs 11.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LPA vs S: side by side

LPA (Logistic Properties of the Americas)S (SentinelOne, Inc.)
1-year return-52.3%+32.4%
5-year returnn/a-65.2%
Volatility (ann.)540.6%48.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.731.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.1%-60.2%
Market cap$0.1B$7.8B
P/E (trailing)5.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: S -60.2% vs -99.1%
-62%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LPA · S

Year-by-year returns

YearLPAS
2022-71.1%
2023+88.1%
2024-19.1%
2025-74.5%-32.4%
2026+12.5%+51.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LPA and S good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LPA and S?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LPA and S is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.03 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is S a good diversifier for LPA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lpa-vs-s.json

LPA vs S: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32LPA vs S-0.32

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LPA vs S correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lpa-vs-s.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lpa-vs-s/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LPA correlations · S correlations