PairBook
HomeLODE › LODE vs VXZ

LODE vs VXZ: Correlation

Comstock Inc. (LODE) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-506.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LODE and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the LODE/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.20, and annualized covariance runs at -506.8 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of LODE's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: LODE led by 62.0 percentage points, +45.9% for LODE against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: LODE is 4.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LODE vs VXZ: side by side

LODE (Comstock Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+45.9%-16.1%
5-year return-88.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)105.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.39-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.5%-36.4%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -78.5%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -88.3%
-16%0%+100%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LODE · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearLODEVXZ
2022-78.3%+0.5%
2023+96.4%-44.0%
2024+45.5%-12.7%
2025-53.0%+5.7%
2026-5.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LODE and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LODE and VXZ?

The LODE/VXZ correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: -0.20), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for LODE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lode-vs-vxz.json

LODE vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19LODE vs VXZ-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LODE vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lode-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lode-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LODE correlations · VXZ correlations