LNT vs PSIG: Correlation
Alliant Energy (LNT) and PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LNT and PSIG?
On 3 years of weekly data the LNT/PSIG correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -804.9 %².
Among the 43 assets we track against LNT, PSIG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #43. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LNT outperformed by 60.8 percentage points (+6.9% for LNT against -53.9% for PSIG). Risk is not evenly split, since PSIG carries 9.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LNT vs PSIG: side by side
| LNT (Alliant Energy) | PSIG (PS International Group Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +6.9% | -53.9% |
| 5-year return | +31.9% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 17.5% | 157.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.09 | 0.97 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -12.4% | -96.0% |
| Market cap | $17.7B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 21.8 | – |
| Dividend yield | 3.03% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Utilities | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LNT | PSIG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -7.4% | – |
| 2023 | -3.8% | – |
| 2024 | +19.5% | – |
| 2025 | +13.5% | +8.3% |
| 2026 | +7.4% | -62.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LNT and PSIG good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, LNT and PSIG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LNT and PSIG?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LNT and PSIG is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is PSIG a good diversifier for LNT?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, LNT and PSIG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?
A reading of -0.30 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lnt-vs-psig.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lnt-vs-psig/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LNT correlations · PSIG correlations
