PairBook
HomeLKQ › LKQ vs PAPL

LKQ vs PAPL: Correlation

How closely do LKQ Corporation (LKQ) and Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1301.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LKQ and PAPL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LKQ and PAPL correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.10) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1301.6 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against LKQ, PAPL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LKQ outperformed by 53.2 percentage points (-17.5% for LKQ against -70.7% for PAPL). Risk is not evenly split, since PAPL carries 5.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LKQ vs PAPL: side by side

LKQ (LKQ Corporation)PAPL (Pineapple Financial Inc.)
1-year return-17.5%-70.7%
5-year return-43.9%n/a
Volatility (ann.)31.2%181.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.57-0.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.6%-99.4%
Market cap$6.4B
P/E (trailing)14.1
Dividend yield4.66%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LKQ 4.66% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LKQ -54.6% vs -99.4%
-91%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LKQ · PAPL

Year-by-year returns

YearLKQPAPL
2022-9.2%
2023-8.6%
2024-20.9%-74.7%
2025-15.0%-84.4%
2026-13.2%-25.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LKQ and PAPL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LKQ and PAPL?

The LKQ/PAPL correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.10, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PAPL a good diversifier for LKQ?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lkq-vs-papl.json

LKQ vs PAPL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23LKQ vs PAPL-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LKQ vs PAPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lkq-vs-papl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lkq-vs-papl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LKQ correlations · PAPL correlations