LIVE vs USBC: Correlation
How closely do Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) and USBC, Inc. (USBC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LIVE and USBC?
Over the past 3 years, LIVE and USBC moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.01 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -4629.9 %².
Out of 15 assets tracked against LIVE, USBC lands near the bottom at #14. Their 12-month results are close: -53.1% for LIVE against -57.7% for USBC. Risk is not evenly split, since USBC carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LIVE vs USBC: side by side
| LIVE (Live Ventures Incorporated) | USBC (USBC, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -53.1% | -57.7% |
| 5-year return | -76.0% | -99.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 94.6% | 193.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.30 | 2.72 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -76.8% | -99.2% |
| Market cap | – | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LIVE | USBC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -0.7% | -5.9% |
| 2023 | -18.8% | -68.1% |
| 2024 | -63.3% | -66.7% |
| 2025 | +58.6% | -90.7% |
| 2026 | -37.1% | -29.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LIVE and USBC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LIVE and USBC?
The LIVE/USBC correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.01, 5 years: -0.22), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is USBC a good diversifier for LIVE?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/live-vs-usbc.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/live-vs-usbc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LIVE correlations · USBC correlations
