PairBook
HomeLITS › LITS vs NATH

LITS vs NATH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lite Strategy, Inc. (LITS) and Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-589.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LITS and NATH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LITS and NATH correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.20 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -589.6 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against LITS, NATH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NATH outperformed by 75.1 percentage points (-80.6% for LITS against -5.5% for NATH). Risk is not evenly split, since LITS carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LITS vs NATH: side by side

LITS (Lite Strategy, Inc.)NATH (Nathan's Famous, Inc.)
1-year return-80.6%-5.5%
5-year return-97.7%+68.7%
Volatility (ann.)93.2%25.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.440.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-89.2%-19.5%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)20.2
Dividend yield0.00%2.05%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NATH 2.05% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NATH -19.5% vs -89.2%Higher 5y return: NATH +68.7% vs -97.7%
-82%0%+7%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LITS · NATH

Year-by-year returns

YearLITSNATH
2022-91.0%+18.7%
2023+55.6%+19.2%
2024-57.6%+3.5%
2025-46.3%+24.6%
2026-24.2%+5.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LITS and NATH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, LITS and NATH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LITS and NATH?

The LITS/NATH correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.20, 5 years: -0.08), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NATH a good diversifier for LITS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, LITS and NATH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lits-vs-nath.json

LITS vs NATH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25LITS vs NATH-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LITS vs NATH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lits-vs-nath.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lits-vs-nath/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LITS correlations · NATH correlations