PairBook
HomeLIN › LIN vs XLB

LIN vs XLB: Correlation

Linde plc (LIN) and Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.64.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.64
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.70
long-run
Ann. covariance
175.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LIN and XLB?

On 3 years of weekly data the LIN/XLB correlation comes out at 0.64, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.47) than the 3-year average (0.64). The 5-year figure is 0.70, and annualized covariance runs at 175.8 %².

In LIN's tracked universe of 36 assets, XLB sits right near the top at #1. The last year tells two different stories: XLB led by 15.7 percentage points, +1.9% for LIN against +17.6% for XLB. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.47 and 0.84, a moderate band.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LIN vs XLB: side by side

LIN (Linde plc)XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+1.9%+17.6%
5-year return+64.6%+36.9%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%16.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.370.72
Max drawdown (3Y)-19.2%-23.2%
Market cap$223.7B
P/E (trailing)31.6
Dividend yield1.26%1.68%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$8.3B
Sector / categoryMaterialsSector ETF
Higher yield: XLB 1.68% vs 1.26%Smaller drawdown: LIN -19.2% vs -23.2%Higher 5y return: LIN +64.6% vs +36.9%

XLB is a Natural Resources fund from State Street Investment Management: $8.3B under management, 26 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.68% trailing dividend yield.

-15%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LIN · XLB

Year-by-year returns

YearLINXLB
2022-4.4%-12.3%
2023+27.7%+12.5%
2024+3.2%+0.1%
2025+3.2%+9.9%
2026+14.6%+18.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 12.94% of XLB is LIN itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are LIN and XLB good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.64 means LIN and XLB share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LIN and XLB?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LIN and XLB is 0.64 over 3 years, 0.47 over 1 year and 0.70 over 5 years.

Is XLB a good diversifier for LIN?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.64 means LIN and XLB share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.64 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lin-vs-xlb.json

LIN vs XLB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.64LIN vs XLB0.64

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LIN vs XLB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lin-vs-xlb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lin-vs-xlb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LIN correlations · XLB correlations