PairBook
HomeLILA › LILA vs VELO

LILA vs VELO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2769.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LILA and VELO?

On 3 years of weekly data the LILA/VELO correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.23) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -2769.8 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against LILA, VELO lands near the bottom at #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VELO ahead by 129.4 points (+52.5% versus +181.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: VELO runs 5.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LILA vs VELO: side by side

LILA (Liberty Latin America Ltd.)VELO (Velo3D, Inc.)
1-year return+52.5%+181.9%
5-year return-13.8%-99.8%
Volatility (ann.)49.9%249.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.47-2.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.1%-99.8%
Market cap$1.6B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LILA -57.1% vs -99.8%Higher 5y return: LILA -13.8% vs -99.8%
-16%0%+729%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LILA · VELO

Year-by-year returns

YearLILAVELO
2022-35.4%-77.1%
2023-2.9%-77.8%
2024-13.0%-95.2%
2025+16.2%+35.7%
2026+65.9%-6.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LILA and VELO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LILA and VELO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.23 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is VELO a good diversifier for LILA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lila-vs-velo.json

LILA vs VELO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22LILA vs VELO-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LILA vs VELO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lila-vs-velo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lila-vs-velo/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LILA correlations · VELO correlations