PairBook
HomeLICN › LICN vs SW

LICN vs SW: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) and Smurfit Westrock (SW) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-53056.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LICN and SW?

Over the past 3 years, LICN and SW moved with a correlation of -0.16, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.12 versus -0.16 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -53056.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, SW places #23 of the 85 assets tracked against LICN. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SW ahead by 84.4 points (-74.7% versus +9.7%). One caveat on sizing: LICN is 212.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LICN vs SW: side by side

LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)SW (Smurfit Westrock)
1-year return-74.7%+9.7%
5-year returnn/a+2.6%
Volatility (ann.)8528.0%40.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-80.220.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.4%-40.5%
Market cap$25.5B
P/E (trailing)51.7
Dividend yield0.00%3.57%
Sector / categoryUS ListedMaterials
Higher yield: SW 3.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SW -40.5% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LICN · SW

Year-by-year returns

YearLICNSW
2022-28.0%
2023+14.1%
2024-91.0%+37.6%
2025+1484.3%-26.2%
2026-56.7%+29.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LICN and SW good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LICN and SW?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with 0.12 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is SW a good diversifier for LICN?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/licn-vs-sw.json

LICN vs SW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16LICN vs SW-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LICN vs SW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/licn-vs-sw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/licn-vs-sw/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LICN correlations · SW correlations