PairBook
HomeLICN › LICN vs MS

LICN vs MS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) and Morgan Stanley (MS) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-54369.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LICN and MS?

Over the past 3 years, LICN and MS moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.07 versus -0.23 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -54369.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, MS places #59 of the 85 assets tracked against LICN. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MS ahead by 121.8 points (-74.7% versus +47.1%). One caveat on sizing: LICN is 301.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LICN vs MS: side by side

LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)MS (Morgan Stanley)
1-year return-74.7%+47.1%
5-year returnn/a+142.0%
Volatility (ann.)8528.0%28.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-80.221.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.4%-29.2%
Market cap$337.5B
P/E (trailing)17.4
Dividend yield0.00%1.94%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: MS 1.94% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MS -29.2% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LICN · MS

Year-by-year returns

YearLICNMS
2022-10.3%
2023+13.9%
2024-91.0%+39.7%
2025+1484.3%+45.2%
2026-56.7%+23.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LICN and MS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LICN and MS?

The LICN/MS correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.07, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MS a good diversifier for LICN?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/licn-vs-ms.json

LICN vs MS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23LICN vs MS-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LICN vs MS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/licn-vs-ms.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/licn-vs-ms/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LICN correlations · MS correlations