PairBook
HomeLICN › LICN vs MCO

LICN vs MCO: Correlation

Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) and Moody's Corporation (MCO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-43233.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LICN and MCO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LICN and MCO correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.03) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -43233.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, MCO places #44 of the 85 assets tracked against LICN. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MCO outperformed by 75.4 percentage points (-74.7% for LICN against +0.7% for MCO). Note the risk asymmetry: LICN runs 330.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LICN vs MCO: side by side

LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)MCO (Moody's Corporation)
1-year return-74.7%+0.7%
5-year returnn/a+39.4%
Volatility (ann.)8528.0%25.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-80.221.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.4%-24.7%
Market cap$88.2B
P/E (trailing)32.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.77%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: MCO 0.77% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCO -24.7% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LICN · MCO

Year-by-year returns

YearLICNMCO
2022-28.0%
2023+41.5%
2024-91.0%+22.2%
2025+1484.3%+8.7%
2026-56.7%+0.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LICN and MCO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LICN and MCO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with 0.03 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MCO a good diversifier for LICN?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/licn-vs-mco.json

LICN vs MCO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20LICN vs MCO-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LICN vs MCO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/licn-vs-mco.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/licn-vs-mco/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LICN correlations · MCO correlations