PairBook
HomeLHX › LHX vs LMT

LHX vs LMT: Correlation

L3Harris (LHX) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.58.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.58
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.69
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.67
long-run
Ann. covariance
346.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LHX and LMT?

On 3 years of weekly data the LHX/LMT correlation comes out at 0.58, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.69) runs above the 3-year figure (0.58). The 5-year figure is 0.67, and annualized covariance runs at 346.4 %².

Among the 30 assets we track against LHX, LMT ranks #4 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LMT ahead by 31.7 points (-3.8% versus +27.9%). The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between 0.01 and 0.74 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LHX vs LMT: side by side

LHX (L3Harris)LMT (Lockheed Martin)
1-year return-3.8%+27.9%
5-year return+24.4%+78.9%
Volatility (ann.)23.0%26.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.510.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-30.3%-31.8%
Market cap$48.8B$130.6B
P/E (trailing)26.620.9
Dividend yield1.09%2.41%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsIndustrials
Lower P/E: LMT 20.9 vs 26.6Higher yield: LMT 2.41% vs 1.09%Smaller drawdown: LHX -30.3% vs -31.8%Higher 5y return: LMT +78.9% vs +24.4%
-3%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LHX · LMT

Year-by-year returns

YearLHXLMT
2022-0.5%+40.5%
2023+3.7%-4.3%
2024+1.9%+10.0%
2025+42.3%+2.5%
2026-10.1%+18.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LHX and LMT good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.58 means LHX and LMT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LHX and LMT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LHX and LMT is 0.58 over 3 years, 0.69 over 1 year and 0.67 over 5 years.

Is LMT a good diversifier for LHX?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.58 means LHX and LMT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.58 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lhx-vs-lmt.json

LHX vs LMT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.58LHX vs LMT0.58

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LHX vs LMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lhx-vs-lmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lhx-vs-lmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LHX correlations · LMT correlations