PairBook
HomeLGL › LGL vs RSI

LGL vs RSI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, LGL Group, Inc. (The) (LGL) and Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.11
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-361.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LGL and RSI?

Over the past 3 years, LGL and RSI moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.11 over 1 year against -0.19 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -361.2 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against LGL, RSI sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. On 12-month performance RSI holds a 5.2-point edge, +15.0% against +20.2%. One caveat on sizing: RSI is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LGL vs RSI: side by side

LGL (LGL Group, Inc. (The))RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.)
1-year return+15.0%+20.2%
5-year return+78.3%+79.9%
Volatility (ann.)32.1%58.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.181.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.2%-42.0%
Market cap$0.1B$6.4B
P/E (trailing)84.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LGL -27.2% vs -42.0%Higher 5y return: RSI +79.9% vs +78.3%
-24%0%+58%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LGL · RSI

Year-by-year returns

YearLGLRSI
2022-5.8%-78.2%
2023+51.6%+25.1%
2024-2.8%+205.6%
2025-3.7%+41.6%
2026+28.2%+34.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LGL and RSI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, LGL and RSI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LGL and RSI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.11 over the last year and 0.07 over 5 years.

Is RSI a good diversifier for LGL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, LGL and RSI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lgl-vs-rsi.json

LGL vs RSI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19LGL vs RSI-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LGL vs RSI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lgl-vs-rsi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lgl-vs-rsi/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LGL correlations · RSI correlations