PairBook
HomeLFWD › LFWD vs VXZ

LFWD vs VXZ: Correlation

Lifeward Ltd. (LFWD) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-721.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LFWD and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the LFWD/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.31, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.28 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.34, and annualized covariance runs at -721.4 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of LFWD's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. On 12-month performance LFWD holds a 14.5-point edge, -1.6% against -16.1%. Risk is not evenly split, since LFWD carries 3.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LFWD vs VXZ: side by side

LFWD (Lifeward Ltd.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-1.6%-16.1%
5-year return-93.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)91.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.20-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.6%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -95.6%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -93.8%
-20%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LFWD · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearLFWDVXZ
2022-38.2%+0.5%
2023+2.4%-44.0%
2024-68.2%-12.7%
2025-66.6%+5.7%
2026+6.4%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LFWD and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, LFWD and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LFWD and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.28 over the last year and -0.34 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for LFWD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.31, LFWD and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

A reading of -0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lfwd-vs-vxz.json

LFWD vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31LFWD vs VXZ-0.31

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![LFWD vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lfwd-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lfwd-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LFWD correlations · VXZ correlations