LFUS vs ST: Correlation
Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.67.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LFUS and ST?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LFUS and ST correlate at 0.67, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.68) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.65, with an annualized covariance of 855.1 %².
Among the 25 assets we track against LFUS, ST ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LFUS ahead by 33.7 points (+62.0% versus +28.3%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LFUS vs ST: side by side
| LFUS (Littelfuse, Inc.) | ST (Sensata Technologies Holding plc) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +62.0% | +28.3% |
| 5-year return | +53.7% | -25.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.3% | 36.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.44 | 1.30 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -45.0% | -58.4% |
| Market cap | $10.7B | $6.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 68.5 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 1.13% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LFUS | ST |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -29.4% | -34.0% |
| 2023 | +22.7% | -5.9% |
| 2024 | -11.0% | -26.1% |
| 2025 | +8.6% | +23.5% |
| 2026 | +67.5% | +28.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LFUS and ST good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.67 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LFUS and ST?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LFUS and ST is 0.67 over 3 years, 0.68 over 1 year and 0.65 over 5 years.
Is ST a good diversifier for LFUS?
To a limited degree. At 0.67 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.67 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lfus-vs-st.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lfus-vs-st/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LFUS correlations · ST correlations
