PairBook
HomeLFT › LFT vs MBAI

LFT vs MBAI: Correlation

How closely do Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Check-Cap Ltd. (MBAI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4603.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LFT and MBAI?

Over the past 3 years, LFT and MBAI moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.39 over 1 year against -0.30 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -4603.9 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against LFT, MBAI lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MBAI outperformed by 973.8 percentage points (-63.0% for LFT against +910.8% for MBAI). Risk is not evenly split, since MBAI carries 14.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LFT vs MBAI: side by side

LFT (Lument Finance Trust, Inc.)MBAI (Check-Cap Ltd.)
1-year return-63.0%+910.8%
5-year return-67.7%-69.3%
Volatility (ann.)32.8%474.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.411.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-75.1%-87.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)1.4
Dividend yield21.82%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LFT 21.82% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LFT -75.1% vs -87.3%Higher 5y return: LFT -67.7% vs -69.3%
-68%0%+1202%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LFT · MBAI

Year-by-year returns

YearLFTMBAI
2022-45.1%-83.7%
2023+38.6%-5.5%
2024+29.4%-52.4%
2025-39.3%+63.6%
2026-44.4%+305.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LFT and MBAI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LFT and MBAI?

The LFT/MBAI correlation stands at -0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.39, 5 years: -0.21), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MBAI a good diversifier for LFT?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lft-vs-mbai.json

LFT vs MBAI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30LFT vs MBAI-0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LFT vs MBAI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lft-vs-mbai.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lft-vs-mbai/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LFT correlations · MBAI correlations