PairBook
HomeLFST › LFST vs TCMD

LFST vs TCMD: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) and Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (TCMD) carry a correlation of 0.44, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
1360.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LFST and TCMD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LFST and TCMD correlate at 0.44, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.55) runs above the 3-year figure (0.44). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.40, with an annualized covariance of 1360.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, TCMD places #5 of the 11 assets tracked against LFST. The last year tells two different stories: LFST led by 48.3 percentage points, +124.0% for LFST against +75.7% for TCMD.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LFST vs TCMD: side by side

LFST (LifeStance Health Group, Inc.)TCMD (Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.)
1-year return+124.0%+75.7%
5-year return-15.6%-47.2%
Volatility (ann.)49.0%63.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.730.87
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.5%-51.8%
Market cap$4.7B$0.5B
P/E (trailing)94.622.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: TCMD 22.0 vs 94.6Smaller drawdown: TCMD -51.8% vs -56.5%Higher 5y return: LFST -15.6% vs -47.2%
-9%0%+133%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). LFST · TCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearLFSTTCMD
2022-48.1%-39.7%
2023+58.5%+24.6%
2024-5.9%+19.8%
2025-4.5%+69.3%
2026+74.7%-20.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LFST and TCMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.44 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LFST and TCMD?

The LFST/TCMD correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.55, 5 years: 0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TCMD a good diversifier for LFST?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.44 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lfst-vs-tcmd.json

LFST vs TCMD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44LFST vs TCMD0.44

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LFST vs TCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lfst-vs-tcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lfst-vs-tcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LFST correlations · TCMD correlations