PairBook
HomeLEN › LEN vs MOBX

LEN vs MOBX: Correlation

Lennar (LEN) and Mobix Labs, Inc. (MOBX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1871.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LEN and MOBX?

On 3 years of weekly data the LEN/MOBX correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.28) than the 3-year average (-0.17). The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -1871.0 %².

Within LEN's tracked universe of 40 assets, MOBX comes in at #31 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: LEN led by 53.1 percentage points, -34.9% for LEN against -88.0% for MOBX. Risk is not evenly split, since MOBX carries 10.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LEN vs MOBX: side by side

LEN (Lennar)MOBX (Mobix Labs, Inc.)
1-year return-34.9%-88.0%
5-year return-11.7%-98.8%
Volatility (ann.)32.6%333.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.84-0.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.5%-99.1%
Market cap$20.5B
P/E (trailing)13.7
Dividend yield2.29%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: LEN 2.29% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LEN -54.5% vs -99.1%Higher 5y return: LEN -11.7% vs -98.8%
-89%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LEN · MOBX

Year-by-year returns

YearLENMOBX
2022-20.6%+3.8%
2023+66.9%-60.6%
2024-7.3%-57.7%
2025-20.8%-84.3%
2026-15.9%-57.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LEN and MOBX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, LEN and MOBX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LEN and MOBX?

The LEN/MOBX correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MOBX a good diversifier for LEN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, LEN and MOBX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/len-vs-mobx.json

LEN vs MOBX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17LEN vs MOBX-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LEN vs MOBX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/len-vs-mobx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/len-vs-mobx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LEN correlations · MOBX correlations