PairBook
HomeLEA › LEA vs WU

LEA vs WU: Correlation

Lear Corporation (LEA) and Western Union Company (The) (WU) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.45.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.45
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.44
long-run
Ann. covariance
402.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LEA and WU?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LEA and WU correlate at 0.45, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.41) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.44, with an annualized covariance of 402.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, WU places #12 of the 17 assets tracked against LEA. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months LEA outperformed by 21.0 percentage points (+15.2% for LEA against -5.8% for WU).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LEA vs WU: side by side

LEA (Lear Corporation)WU (Western Union Company (The))
1-year return+15.2%-5.8%
5-year return-13.4%-49.2%
Volatility (ann.)28.8%31.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.610.48
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.0%-43.2%
Market cap$8.2B$2.2B
P/E (trailing)11.65.9
Dividend yield2.48%12.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: WU 5.9 vs 11.6Higher yield: WU 12.95% vs 2.48%Smaller drawdown: WU -43.2% vs -47.0%Higher 5y return: LEA -13.4% vs -49.2%
-20%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LEA · WU

Year-by-year returns

YearLEAWU
2022-30.7%-17.9%
2023+16.4%-6.2%
2024-31.2%-3.8%
2025+24.9%-2.6%
2026+9.1%-18.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LEA and WU good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.45, LEA and WU keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LEA and WU?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.45 over 3 years, with 0.41 over the last year and 0.44 over 5 years.

Is WU a good diversifier for LEA?

Reasonably. At 0.45, LEA and WU keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?

A reading of 0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lea-vs-wu.json

LEA vs WU: 3-year weekly correlation 0.45LEA vs WU0.45

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![LEA vs WU correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lea-vs-wu.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lea-vs-wu/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LEA correlations · WU correlations