PairBook
HomeLCNB › LCNB vs NODK

LCNB vs NODK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, LCNB Corporation (LCNB) and NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) carry a correlation of 0.43, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
289.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LCNB and NODK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LCNB and NODK correlate at 0.43, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.28) than the 3-year average (0.43). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 289.0 %².

Within LCNB's tracked universe of 14 assets, NODK comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months LCNB came out ahead by 12.7 percentage points (+27.4% against +14.7%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LCNB vs NODK: side by side

LCNB (LCNB Corporation)NODK (NI Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+27.4%+14.7%
5-year return+43.8%-21.2%
Volatility (ann.)29.6%22.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.490.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-23.8%-28.4%
Market cap$0.3B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)11.240.1
Dividend yield4.59%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: LCNB 11.2 vs 40.1Higher yield: LCNB 4.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LCNB -23.8% vs -28.4%Higher 5y return: LCNB +43.8% vs -21.2%
-11%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. LCNB · NODK

Year-by-year returns

YearLCNBNODK
2022-3.4%-29.8%
2023-7.5%-2.1%
2024+1.7%+20.9%
2025+14.7%-15.3%
2026+21.1%+14.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LCNB and NODK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LCNB and NODK?

The LCNB/NODK correlation stands at 0.43 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.28, 5 years: 0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NODK a good diversifier for LCNB?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

A reading of 0.43 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lcnb-vs-nodk.json

LCNB vs NODK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43LCNB vs NODK0.43

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LCNB vs NODK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lcnb-vs-nodk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lcnb-vs-nodk/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LCNB correlations · NODK correlations