LBTYB vs SLAB: Correlation
Liberty Global Ltd. - Class B (LBTYB) and Silicon Laboratories, Inc. (SLAB) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.38.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LBTYB and SLAB?
On 3 years of weekly data the LBTYB/SLAB correlation comes out at 0.38, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.73) runs above the 3-year figure (0.38). The 5-year figure is 0.29, and annualized covariance runs at 1064.4 %².
Within LBTYB's tracked universe of 22 assets, SLAB comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SLAB led by 46.3 percentage points, +10.5% for LBTYB against +56.8% for SLAB.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LBTYB vs SLAB: side by side
| LBTYB (Liberty Global Ltd. - Class B) | SLAB (Silicon Laboratories, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.5% | +56.8% |
| 5-year return | -55.0% | +36.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 57.5% | 48.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.32 | 1.40 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -58.2% | -45.7% |
| Market cap | $4.4B | $7.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LBTYB | SLAB |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -32.5% | -34.3% |
| 2023 | -6.3% | -2.5% |
| 2024 | -27.3% | -6.1% |
| 2025 | -8.7% | +5.2% |
| 2026 | +9.4% | +67.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LBTYB and SLAB good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.38, LBTYB and SLAB keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LBTYB and SLAB?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LBTYB and SLAB is 0.38 over 3 years, 0.73 over 1 year and 0.29 over 5 years.
Is SLAB a good diversifier for LBTYB?
Reasonably. At 0.38, LBTYB and SLAB keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?
A reading of 0.38 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lbtyb-vs-slab.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lbtyb-vs-slab/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LBTYB correlations · SLAB correlations
