PairBook
HomeLASE › LASE vs ZUMZ

LASE vs ZUMZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE) and Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carry a correlation of -0.29, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3104.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are LASE and ZUMZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LASE and ZUMZ correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.59) than the 3-year average (-0.29). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.23, with an annualized covariance of -3104.7 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against LASE, ZUMZ lands near the bottom at #13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ZUMZ outperformed by 61.6 percentage points (-64.9% for LASE against -3.3% for ZUMZ). Note the risk asymmetry: LASE runs 4.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

LASE vs ZUMZ: side by side

LASE (Laser Photonics Corporation)ZUMZ (Zumiez Inc.)
1-year return-64.9%-3.3%
5-year returnn/a-57.5%
Volatility (ann.)212.3%50.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.041.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.8%-60.2%
Market cap$0.1B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ZUMZ -60.2% vs -96.8%
-71%0%+124%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. LASE · ZUMZ

Year-by-year returns

YearLASEZUMZ
2022-54.7%
2023-42.2%-6.4%
2024+389.8%-5.8%
2025-57.3%+35.9%
2026-35.6%-32.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are LASE and ZUMZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between LASE and ZUMZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.29 over 3 years, with -0.59 over the last year and -0.23 over 5 years.

Is ZUMZ a good diversifier for LASE?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lase-vs-zumz.json

LASE vs ZUMZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29LASE vs ZUMZ-0.29

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![LASE vs ZUMZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/lase-vs-zumz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lase-vs-zumz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: LASE correlations · ZUMZ correlations